How Comparative Law Has Contributed To Constitutional Development Across The World

A constitution is a unique document that assists a nation to govern its citizens, relationships with other nations and organizations, relationships with its citizens and all social and economic activities among other uses. Every country that uses a set of rules to describe courses of action whenever there are problems is able to control challenges however demanding they may prove to be. Countries where there is careful integration of laws by ensuring only the most useful parts of law are used are able to overcome even the most complex challenges.

Through comparative law, experts can develop new and stronger rules to help in the process of governing their country.

What is comparative law?

Comparative law by definition is the art of comparing laws from different nations or organizations. Through the art, agencies are able to pick only the most useful parts of law for integration into a new constitution. The art began in the 18th century and its effect spread across the years to date. Researchers who study the laws applied in other jurisdictions help in the development of constitutional law and can offer the needed insight for other countries looking to develop new laws.

The reason it is necessary to develop new laws is because it reaches a point and the laws available in a country prove obsolete or unable to serve the needs presented by the environment. Some laws that were used more than 50 years ago may not make sense today because a lot has changed in that span. Other laws that are used today were developed less than 20 years ago and this is to accommodate the new things that have changed the way people conduct business or engage with each other.

About Sujit Choudhry

Sujit Choudhry, a renowned professor based in California, is a strong force in the comparative law field. He also doubles as a constitutional development expert and an advisor to leading organizations like the United Nations and World Bank. He boats of an experience record of over 30 years and his ideas have been used to cure violence and bring about peace building in different countries.

Courtesy of his skills and prowess, Sujit Choudhry was able to tour countries like Nepal and Sri Lanka, where he went to offer advice and contribution to help in the development of new systems of governance. Sujit Choudhry is also the Center for Constitutional Transitions founding director. The organization invites constitutional development experts from different regions, who come with support to make it possible to draft useful ideas for development of new laws.

SEC Whistleblower Attorney Represents Oklahoma Firefighters’ Investors in a Law Suit Filed Against Xerox Corporation

Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System receives legal representation of SEC Whistleblower attorney and files a class action law suit against Xerox Corporation and their executives. Oklahoma Firefighters’ investors claim that from April 2012 through October 2015 the company violated SEC regulations by distributing false and deceptive profitability and growth information pertaining to Health Enterprise’s software product. In 2014, financial disclosures revealed cost overruns, customer complaints, and delays.  The corporation lost millions of dollars in capitalized stock with per share dropping by $4. 56 from December 5th, 2014 to October 27, 2015.

 

Xerox acquired the Health Enterprise software through an acquisition transaction of Affiliated Computer Services in 2010. Xerox purchased Affiliated Computer for $6.4 billion and took full control of the technology product. Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System claims Xerox Corporation failed to disclose Health Enterprise developments were experiencing delays and cost overruns; inability to bring profits; and lack of reasonable basis of its operations and prospects.

 

Respected law firm, Labaton Sucharow LLP filed the securities class action law suit on behalf of Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System against Xerox. An investor who purchased Xerox’s common stock between April 23rd, 2012 and October 23rd, 2015 are included in the law suit and may be eligible to seek appointment as lead plaintiff. December 23rd, 2016 is the last day to file motion papers with the United States District Court for the Southern District of NY. Lead plaintiff, a representative appointed by the court is for absent members of the law suit. As an absent member, there is no requirement to seek appointment as lead plaintiff to share in the recovery. Before contacting a SEC Whistleblower lawyer, visit the SEC Whistleblower Advocate website to learn about the program and the rights of investors.

 

Labaton Sucharow is the first law firm to specialize in SEC Whistleblower legal representation since the new program was established in 2010. The firm is an advocate for representing and protecting whistleblowers exposing misconduct of trading corporations. The whistleblowing program is not only for whistleblowers, but investors, such as Xerox’s investors who received losses on their investments. Investors who invested capital into Xerox’s common stock, contact Francis P. McConville, a representative with Labaton to be considered as lead plaintiff and partake in the lawsuit.